The court disposed of a criminal appeal regarding conviction under Section 323 IPC. The Single Judge confirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the imposition of fine and in default imprisonment was correct and free from infirmity.
Criminal Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence under Section 323 IPC confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.736 OF 2016
JUDGMENT :
This appeal is filed by the appellant/ de-facto complainant aggrieved by the judgment dated 12.01.2016 passed in S.C.No.122 of 2015 by the Assistant Sessions Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District (for short ‘the trial Court’) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/ de-facto complainant, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (A.P.) appearing for the 1st respondent-State and perused the record.
As per the record, a fine of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand only) is imposed against each of the accused Nos.1 to 6, in default directed each of them to suffer simple imprisonment for 2 months, for the offence under Section 323 I.P.C. The trial Court while dealing with the subject matter of the Appeal has taken all the facts and circumstances into account and rightly imposed the said fine. There is no infirmity. There is nothing to take a different opinion and the impugned judgment is confirmed.
Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is disposed of.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Appeal shall stand closed.
DR.SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
DATED: 08-11-2017 Hsd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the fine compounded for non-appearance at trial warrants setting aside the conviction under Section 323 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Appellant/De-facto Complainant
State
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
