The complainant admittedly was in possession of the five cheques issued for various amounts. Thus, the total amount covered by the five cheques is Rs.23,30,518/-, which is allegedly issued towards discharge of part of the legally enforceable debt by the accused. But, the contention of the accused is that those five cheques were not issued towards legally enforceable debts and those cheques were obtained by the police forcibly confining the accused and her husband in Mahankali Police Station, Secunderabad. The accused also denied placing any order for supply of material from the complainant’s firm during the month of December, 2013. P.W.1 during evidence, while reiterating his contention about placing order and products of material, under Exs.P-1 to P-12 for Rs.37,89,781/produced Exs.P-13 to P-17, the cheques allegedly issued by the accused towards discharge of legally enforceable debt, cheque return memos marked as Exs.P-18 to P-22, Ex.P-23 legal notice dated 02.04.2014, to establish that the accused purchased material worth Rs.37,89,781/- and issue of cheques towards discharge of liability and compliance of Section 138(b) of N.I. Act i.e. demand for payment of amount covered by those cheques. In the cross-examination, several suggestions were put to the accused that the accused never placed any order to the complainant firm for supply of any material i.e. steel tubes at any point of time and that the husband of the accused was confined in Mahankali Police Station on 14.02.2014 and
