The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to the monetary value being below the ceiling limit, with questions of law left open.
No order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
CEA No.17 of 2006
JUDGMENT: (per VRS, J)
Since the monetary value of this appeal is less than the ceiling limit, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the questions of law are left open.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand
dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J 15th FEBRUARY, 2017.
________________
kvni
V Ramasubramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
