This order closes a Contempt Case (C.C.No.484 of 2017) where the petitioner represented partial payment was made by respondents, granting liberty to proceed for recovery of the balance elsewhere.
The Contempt Case is closed, and the petitioner is granted liberty to avail other remedies for recovery of the balance amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.C.No.484 of 2017
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents had considered representation dt.30-12-2014 and had even released part of the amount claimed by the petitioner and seeks leave of the Court to proceed against the respondents for recovery of the balance amount in an appropriate forum.
Therefore, the Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy in regard to the balance amount
claimed by the petitioner. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 24-03-2017 kvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Case should be closed after partial release by respondents and liberty given for balance amount recovery?
Petitioner
Respondents
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
