This common order dismissed two contempt cases (Nos. 1019 and 1020 of 2017) because the alleged disobedience to prior orders was voluntarily complied with by the petitioners, as stated by their counsel.
The contempt cases were dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.BALAYOGI
CONTEMPT CASE NOS.1019 AND 1020 OF 2017
C O M M O N O R D E R
( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar )
Sri K.Rama Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners in these contempt cases, states that the orders, alleged disobedience to which led to the filing of these contempt cases, have since been complied with.
Recording the said statement, the contempt cases are
dismissed. No order as to costs.
__
SANJAY KUMAR, J
N.BALAYOGI, J
4 th AUGUST, 2017
PGS
Sanjay Kumar
N. Balayogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
