The Writ Petition was dismissed by a two-judge bench as it was filed without instructions from the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO.9340 OF 2011
ORDER: {Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri M.Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits
that he has no instructions to appear in the matter.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
____
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
(A.SHANKAR NARAYANA, J)
26 th December 2016
RRB
Petitioner
Respondent
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
