Writ petition dismissed for default as the petitioner was not interested in proceeding despite granted time.
Writ petition dismissed for default; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions in the writ stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.6779 of 2009
ORDER:
S r i V.Kishore, learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the petitioner has taken the bundle together with no objection and he is not appearing in the writ petition.
From the record, it appears that the petitioner has not engaged another Advocate in the place of Sri V.Kishore. On 0704-2016 and 28-04-2016, time was granted to verify the present position. With the passage of time, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in working out the writ remedy.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_____________ S. V. BHATT, J
Dt: 01-06-2016 Prv
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.6779 of 2009
01-06-2016
Prv
Petitioner
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
