Kilari Adinarayana v. The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the cause did not survive due to paucity of time.
The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the cause did not survive due to paucity of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.6746 of 2011
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to paucity of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________ S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 14.03.2016 pab
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court