The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the matter, and no one appeared on their behalf to argue merits.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.6208 OF 2005
DATED: 04.02.2016
Between:
Smt. Hameed Sultana
… Petitioner
and
The District Collector and others
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.6208 of 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner.
Heard Sri Pashyam Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3.
With the passage of time, petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting this writ petition further. Hence, nobody is coming forward to work it out on merits. We are therefore, constrained to dismiss this writ petition for non-prosecution. Order accordingly.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
4th FEBRUARY, 2016.
A.V.SESHA SAI, J
kvni
Smt. Hameed Sultana
The District Collector and others
Dilip B. Bhosale
A.V.Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
