Nazma Begum v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Writ…
CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Writ…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Writ Petition No.5954 of 2014
ORDER:
As none appeared for the petitioner on 30.09.2016, the Writ Petition was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, though the Writ Petition is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, neither is the learned counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ. Date:14.10.2016. cs
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court