The petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive dates. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
W.P.No.5414 of 2009
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 15.11.2016, none appeared and no representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, none appears and no representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition
shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO 16th November, 2016 rkk
A.Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
