It is the case of the petitioner that he made an application dated 27.06.2011, for construction of a compound wall to protect the property over an extent of 300 Sq.Yards situated in Plot No.90, forming part of Survey Nos.86, 87 and 92, under the name and title of “Amar Jyothi Weaker Sections Co-operative Housing Society”. As there was no response from the respondents, exercising the right under Section 238(6) of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (in short “the Act”), the petitioner made construction of the compound wall and a small room in the said property. Now, the petitioner received a communication dated 25.01.2012, informing that the permission cannot be granted on account of the claim of Sri K. Siva Reddy-2nd respondent, who sought permission for construction of compound wall to open Plot situated in Sy.Nos.78, 79, 80, 81 & 82, and on inspection, it was found that there was a plot showing Plot No.90, which does not belong to him and as such, the plan was returned to Sri K. Siva Reddy. The second reason cited was that Sri K. Siva Reddy lodged a complaint not to accord sanction to the petitioner as I.A.No.32 of 2012 in O.S.No.17 of 2012 is pending on the file of learned XI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. The Cantonment Board also informed that as the petitioner proceeded to construct the compound wall unauthorisedly, action would be initiated in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
