G.Krishna Murthy Naidu Chittoor Dist Vs Prl Secy Dept of Revenue Hyd and 5 Others

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

W.P.Nos.4398 and 4441 OF 2016

COMMON ORDER:

The petitioners in both the writ petitions filed different revisions, which are pending before the 2^nd respondent. Though the said revisions are admitted by the 2^nd respondent, under the impugned orders Ex.P-1, dated 21-12-2015, the request for grant of stay was rejected on the basis of available record. The said orders are questioned in these writ petitions.

¶5

Sri A.Prabhakar Sharma, who appears for the 5^th respondent, submits that the maintainability of the revisions itself is questioned by the 5^th respondent and also submits that the 2^nd respondent has already called for the records and the main revision petitions itself can be heard and disposed of at an early date.

¶6

It is evident from the impugned orders that the 2^nd respondent has entertained the revisions against the orders of the 3^rd respondent, dated 23-05-2015 questioning the ryotwari patta granted to the 5^th respondent.

¶7

Since the 5^th respondent has succeeded before the 3^rd respondent, the petitioners have filed the revisions. Since the orders of the 3^rd respondent, which are impugned in the revisions, are dismissed, there was nothing to be stayed by the 2^nd respondent pending revisions. Hence, the rejection of stay, under the impugned orders by the 2^nd respondent, is clearly justified and no interference of this Court is called for. However, the 2^nd respondent may fix an early date and hear the petitioners and the respondents and dispose of the

¶8

revisions itself on merits in accordance with law.

¶9

Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶10

_______________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J 16.02.2016 Prv

G.Krishna Murthy Naidu Chittoor Dist v. Prl Secy Dept of Revenue Hyd and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Krishna Murthy Naidu Chittoor Dist v. Prl Secy Dept of Revenue Hyd and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Eswaraiah , Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Ven Swarupa W/o Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana

Konda Chandrasekhar Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Its Principal Secretary

Nimishakavi Siva Ramakrishna Vsp and Another Vs Secy Revenue Dept Hyd and 3 Others

Sri Chundi John, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its PrI.Secretary to

Smt Kasarla Sudha Rani Vs The State of Telangana