Disposed

Seetha Raja Komaraiah v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Telangana HC6 Dec 2016WP/42369/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge order disposes of a writ petition by holding the issue covered by a previous batch order dated 22.06.2016. It orders re-examination of medical fitness of petitioners by a committee of doctors and directs the District Medical and Health Officer to add a government practitioner to the committee.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to undergo re-examination before a medical committee; earlier medical certificates valid if no appearance.

Seetha Raja Komaraiah Vs The Chairman and Managing… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶2

WP.No.42369 of 2016

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

Heard the counsel for petitioner; Sri J. Sreenivas Rao, counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3, and Ms.Anjali Agarwal, counsel for 4^th respondent.

¶5

2. The counsel on both sides state that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is covered by the order dt.22.06.2016 in WP.No.38451 of 2015 and batch.

¶6

3. Therefore, this Writ Petition is also disposed of with the following directions :

¶7

“1. The company shall issue notices to all the petitioners who have not retired as on today and in respect of whom medical certificates were issued earlier and the petitioners in the above batch of cases have to undergo re-examination of their medical condition as on the date of examination by the committee appointed by this Court.

¶8

2. The petitioners who receive such notices from the company shall invariably appear before the medical board at the time specified and undergo medical examination without any demur and their failure, if any, would be constructed as their disinclination and the medical certificates issued earlier by the medical board constituted by the company shall remain valid.

¶9

3. If the medical board constituted by this Court on reexamination holds any persons found to be unfit, the declaration shall relate to the date of the medical certificates issued by the medical board constituted by the company earlier and the age of the persons who have been declared fit or unfit shall be reckoned from the date of

¶10

MSR,J wp_42369_2016

¶11

::2::

¶12

medical certificates issued by the board of the company and their rights and liabilities shall be regulated accordingly.

¶13

4. This Court accordingly requests the District Medical and Health Officer, Khammam to depute one Government Medical Practitioner to head the Committee of Doctors for examination of the petitioners as aforesaid. The DMHO, Khammam shall inform the name of the doctor to the company within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. The company shall constitute the committee of doctors with the doctor recommended by the DMHO, Khammam as the head of the committee and consisting of the Company Doctors, viz., Dr. B. Sashidhar Reddy of Ramagundam and Dr.B.Madhu Kumar of Bellampally. It is needless to observe that the said Committee of Doctors would discharge their duty in an objective manner without being influenced by any external influences as allegations are leveled by both sides across the bar that the litigation is initiated and continued for oblique purposes.”

¶14

4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

¶15

__________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶16

Date: 06-12-2016 Ndr/*

Seetha Raja Komaraiah v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seetha Raja Komaraiah v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sunitha, Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Raja Kalidindi Kumara Rangaraju Bahadur Vs Smt.Kalindindi Syamala Devi

Karri Somi Reddy Vs Manda Nagi Reddy

P.Geetha Devi, W/o. Late M.Venkata Krishna Satya Prasad Vs The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary

M. Venkateshwarlu, Vs Sri.G v. Raman Rao

The President , The Yemmiganur Weavers Cooperative Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Principal