Disposed
Gajjela Narasimha Reddy, v. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa
Telangana HCWP/42330/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.42330 of 2015
Dt:04.01.2016
Between:
G.Narasimha Reddy.
… Petitioner
And
The Superintendent of Police and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 42330 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to respondent No.1 for the relief as prayed for in the writ petition, namely action against respondent No.2.
Without examining merits of the contentions urged by the petitioner, we dispose of this writ petition as not pressed with liberty as prayed. If the petitioner makes representation, as aforementioned, respondent No.1 shall consider and deal with the same on merits in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 16 weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________
________________________
Dt:04.01.2016
kdl
G.Narasimha Reddy
Superintendent of Police
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court