Dismissed
M/s. Hitech Paper Mart v. The Authorized Officer
Telangana HCWP/40361/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No. 40361 of 2016
ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
Aggrieved by a conditional order of stay granted by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the petitioners have come up with the above writ petition.
All that the Tribunal has done is to direct the petitioners to make payment of 30% of the liability, in two installments. We do not think that any interference with the said order is warranted. If the petitioners want extension of time to comply with the order, it is open to them to move the Tribunal. In case the Tribunal accepts the extension of time, even if the auction is held today, the same can always be set at naught by the Tribunal.
With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
_____________________ G. SHYAM PRASAD, J
22nd November, 2016 cbs
VRS,J & GSP,J WP No. 40361 of 2016
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN √ AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition No. 40361 of 2016 (Per VRS,J)
22nd November, 2016
cbs
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
G. SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court