An interim order rendered the dispute regarding the petitioner's exclusion from a test and interview infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition for lack of cause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Writ Petition No.35651 of 2012
ORDER:
The relief sought for in this writ petition is to declare the action of the respondents in not receiving the petitioner’s application and not allowing him to appear in the test and interview as arbitrary and illegal.
Sri K.Nageswara Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, the petitioner was called for the interview and, as such, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.
As the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous, the Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall be also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ) 02nd December, 2016 JSU
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Writ Petition No.35651 of 2012
Date: 02.12.2016
JSU
Petitioner
Respondents
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
