The single-judge court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination as a stipendiary warder for unauthorized absence, holding that the petitioner inordinately delayed the approach by five years without assigning a reason.
The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WP. No.35263 of 2016
O R D E R:
Petitioner is questioning the proceedings dt.26.09.2011 issued by the 3rd respondent terminating his services as a Stipendiary Warder on the ground of unauthorized absence from 18.07.2011 to 24.09.2011.
_____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
19th October, 2016.
gra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition questioning termination of services due to unauthorized absence should be disposed of given the inordinate delay in approaching the court.
Petitioner
3rd Respondent
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
