This batch discharge deprives opines the University should regularize affiliation granted to certain courses after the writ petitions, while dismissing other reliefs as admissions were already made.
The University shall regularize the affiliation already granted to some courses; other reliefs rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION Nos. 24526, 24654, 25044, 25807, 25864, 27208,
27209, 27527, 30339, 30526, 30549, 30718, 30974
and 33537 of 2016
COMMON ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
The petitioners in all these writ petitions came up with a challenge to the Affiliation Procedure and Regulations 2016 of the respondent University, incidentally, when their request for affiliation of certain courses was rejected by the University.
At the time when the writ petitions came up for orders as to admission, we passed interim orders in a few cases, directing the University to re-consider the issue with particular reference to some courses where we were satisfied that the petitioners had, in fact, the necessary infrastructure. Pursuant to those interim orders, the University has also granted affiliation to some of the courses.
Today, the counselling for all the courses, for which the petitioners sought affiliation, is already over. The admissions have also taken place.
VRS,J & ANIS,J WP Nos.24526 of 2016 & batch
2
Therefore, nothing else remains for adjudication in these cases, except to say that in respect of the courses, for which affiliation has been granted by the University after the filing of the writ petitions either pursuant to our interim orders or otherwise, the affiliation should be regularized by the University. In respect of the other courses and the other reliefs, the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed.
Therefore, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of, to the following effect:
ii. The other reliefs sought in these writ petitions are rejected.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
writ petitions shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
ANIS, J.
13th October, 2016 cbs
VRS,J & ANIS,J WP Nos.24526 of 2016 & batch
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS
W.P.Nos.24526, 24654, 25044, 25807, 25864, 27208, 27209, 27527, 30339, 30526, 30549, 30718, 30974 and 33537 of 2016
(Per VRS,J)
13th October, 2016
cbs
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner courses with affiliated status granted post-filing should be regularized.
Whether the other reliefs and challenges to affiliation regulations should be dismissed.
Petitioners
University
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
ANIS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
