Partly allowed

Karshak Vidya Parishad v. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Telangana HC17 Oct 2016WP/30173/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A common order dismissing multiple writ petitions challenging affiliation regulations. Since counselling was over, the court ordered regularization of courses already affiliated under interim orders but dismissed other reliefs.

What did the court decide?

Respondent University shall regularize affiliation of some courses already granted after filing; other reliefs rejected; pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed.

Karshak Vidya Parishad Vs Jawaharlal Nehru… — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND

¶2

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION Nos. 30134, 30138, 30145, 30173 and

¶3

30499 of 2016

¶4

COMMON ORDER: (Per VRS,J)

¶5

The petitioners in all these writ petitions came up with a challenge to the Affiliation Procedure and Regulations 2016 of the respondent University, incidentally, when their request for affiliation of certain courses was rejected by the University.

¶6

At the time when the writ petitions came up for orders as to admission, we passed interim orders in a few cases, directing the University to re-consider the issue with particular reference to some courses where we were satisfied that the petitioners had, in fact, the necessary infrastructure. Pursuant to those interim orders, the University has also granted affiliation to some of the courses.

¶7

Today, the counselling for all the courses, for which the petitioners sought affiliation, is already over. The admissions have also taken place.

¶8

VRS,J & UDPR,J WP Nos.24526 of 2016 & batch

¶9

¶10

Therefore, nothing else remains for adjudication in these cases, except to say that in respect of the courses, for which affiliation has been granted by the University after the filing of the writ petitions either pursuant to our interim orders or otherwise, the affiliation should be regularized by the University. In respect of the other courses and the other reliefs, the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed.

¶11

Therefore, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of, to the following effect:

¶12

i. The University shall regularize the affiliation already granted to some of the courses run by the petitioners after the filing of the writ petitions, either pursuant to our interim orders or otherwise.

¶13

ii. The other reliefs sought in these writ petitions are rejected.

¶14

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the

¶15

writ petitions shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶16

__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J

¶17

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J

¶18

17^th October, 2016 cbs

¶19

VRS,J & UDPR,J WP Nos.24526 of 2016 & batch

¶20

¶21

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN 

¶22

AND

¶23

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

¶24

WRIT PETITION Nos. 30134, 30145, 30138, 30173 and 30499 of 2016

¶25

(Per VRS,J)

¶26

17^th October, 2016

¶27

cbs

Karshak Vidya Parishad v. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karshak Vidya Parishad v. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Chandra Sekhara Rao, Vs The Director

Karshak Vidya Parishad Vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

M/s Spectra EquipmentsPvt Ltd, Vs The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India

Sri Mohd Syed Qureshi, Vs The Income Tax Officer