Chandragiri Preethi Raj v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
This short order in W.P. No. 29541 of 2016 held that the main prayer of mandamus declaring the fourth respondent's non-consideration of petitioner's objections illegal was effectively granted as the objections were subsequently considered, though not in the petitioner's favor. The writ petition was therefore closed with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The main prayer for mandamus was deemed granted as the objections were considered; the Writ Petition is closed.