The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the non-renewal of a commission agent licence. It directed the respondent to process the renewal application using the 1994 norms instead of the 2015 norms.
Directed respondent No.4 to consider the renewal application using 1994 norms within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.29535 OF 2016
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.4 and 5 in not renewing the licence of the petitioner bearing No.19/ 2008-13 as commission agent as illegal and arbitrary.
2
______________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 06.09.2016 Rns
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to declare the non-renewal of the commission agent licence as illegal and arbitrary.
Whether to direct the respondent to consider the renewal application under specific norms.
Whether to dispose of the writ petition in accordance with a common order.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Petitioner's firm
Respondent No.4
Respondent No.5
Sunil Chowdary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
