K. Aruna v. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE &…
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE &…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE &
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION Nos.26739, 28730 and 34415 of 2011
COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B.Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for parties.
2. Mr. Krishna Reddy Putta, learned counsel for petitioners, submits that these petitions may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 11.07.2016 passed in WP.No.24260 of 2008 and batch since the questions involved therein and in these petitions are similar.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection for disposal of these petitions in terms of the order dated 11.07.2016.
3. The order dated 11.07.2016 passed in WP.No.24260 of 2008 and batch reads thus:
they shall not have any objection for fencing FTL and even for removal of structures, if any, therein, after following due process of law and subject to their right to claim compensation in accordance with law.
(6) Under any circumstances, the petitioners or other individuals/encroachers shall not obstruct the concerned official respondent from erecting fence covering the FTL after the exercise of survey is complete and subject to their right to seek compensation, as aforementioned.
Accordingly, these writ petitions are also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications,
if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, HACJ
A.V. SESHA SAI, J
July 20, 2016 DSK
Petitioners/Unofficial Respondents
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
Respondents concerned with Irrigation and Revenue
DILIP B.BHOSALE
A.V. SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court