Common order on two similar writ petitions. The High Court followed a prior judgment, dismissed the petitions without costs, and closed any pending miscellaneous petitions.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION Nos.2628 and 2697 of 2016
COMMON ORDER:
Heard.
Both the writ petitions are similar and the petitioners claim that they were granted house site pattas and they have constructed houses bearing D.Nos.10247/2 and 10-247/4. Alleging that there is interference by the 4th respondent, without following due process of law, the present writ petition is filed.
The issue raised in these Writ Petitions is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.Nos.2070 and 2072 of 2016, dated 27.01.2016.
In view of the same, following the aforesaid judgment, these Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in these Writ Petitions shall stand closed.
VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J
01.02.2016
Note:- Office to attach a copy of the judgment
in W.P.Nos.2070 and 2072 of 2016,
dated 27.01.2016, to this order.
(B/o)
Prv
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION Nos.2628 and 2697 of 2016
01-02-2016
Prv
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.Nos.2070 and 2072 of 2016, dated 27.01.2016Relied on¶6
Vilas V.Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
