Disposed
Maduri Samba Siva Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Telangana HCWP/2570/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos.2570 and 2643 of 2014
Dt:08.02.2016
Between:
M.Samba Siva Rao and others.
… Petitioners
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos.2570 and 2643 of 2014
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, invited our attention to the order, dated 21.04.2014, passed in W.P.Nos.33584, 37477, 33931, 34378, 34905 and 34949 of 2013 and prayed for disposal of these writ petitions also in terms thereof.
Mr.B.Mahender Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader, has no objection for disposal of these two writ petitions in terms of the order, dated 21.04.2014, passed in the aforementioned writ petitions.
The order, dated 21.04.2014, reads thus:
“No counter-affidavit is required to be filed in these matters, as it is the allegation of the writ petitioners that without giving any notice of hearing, the house element is sought to be demolished pursuant to the order passed by this Court.
We, therefore, direct the District Collector concerned, without serving any notice of hearing, demolition should not be proceeded with, provided the petitioners make a representation together with documents in support of their case, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If no such representation is made, in terms of this order, the writ petitions shall stand dismissed. If the representation is made, after giving personal hearing, appropriate decision
shall be taken by the District Collector concerned, in accordance with law, with reasons. All these Writ Petitions are disposed of with above direction. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.”
These two writ petitions also stand disposed of in terms of the aforementioned order. If the petitioners fail to make a representation together with documents in support of their case, the consequences as indicated in the order would follow. It is needless to mention that if the representation is made, the District Collector, after giving personal hearing, shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law with reasons.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ ________________________ S.V. BHATT, J Dt:08.02.2016 kdl
M.Samba Siva Rao and others.
Government of Andhra Pradesh and others.
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court