The bench dismissed a writ petition as infructuous based on the counsel's submission, citing no legal costs and closing pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
W.P.No.24802 of 2013
Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ G.CHANDRAIAH, J
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Dt: 09.02.2016
Murthy
G.CHANDRAIAH
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
