Petitioner challenged the matter invoking the ratio of a Full Bench decision. The court held the writ petition infructuous in view of said precedent and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No. 24616 OF 2002
04-02-2016
Between:
M/s. Rayalaseema Concrete Sleepers Private Limited, 205, Amarchand Sharma Complex, S.P. Road, Secunderabad - 500 003, A.P., India, rep., by its Vice President (Operations), Mr. B.J.Karandikar, S/o. Janardhan Karandikar, aged about 42 years
… Petitioner
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No. 24616 OF 2002
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment of the Full Bench in L. Venkateswara Rao vs. Sigareni Collieries[1] , where similar challenge, as raised in the present writ petition, was considered, this writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
A.V. SESHA SAI, J
04-02-2016 ks
[1] 1999 (3) ALT 199 (FB)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Venkateswara Rao vs. Sigareni CollieriesFollowed¶16
1999 (3) ALT 199 (FB)
M/s. Rayalaseema Concrete Sleepers Private Limited
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Dilip B. Bhosale
A.V. Seshasai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
