A writ petition regarding bank recovery proceedings was closed without argument as the amount was paid and the bank had stopped further action. No order as to costs.
Writ petition closed; miscellaneous petitions if any, closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN
Present
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.23351 of 2009
Between:
Chejerla Subbaramaiah, S/o. Raghavaiah, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Chejerla, Ongole Rural Mandal, Prakasam District.
.. Petitioner
AND
The Deputy Registrar/Officer on Special Duty, PDCC Bank Ltd., Ongole & 3 others
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.23351 of 2009
ORDER:
There is no representation for the petitioners.
2. Mr. A. Sameer Kumar Reddy, learned counsel representing the 4th respondent submits that the amount for which recovery proceedings are initiated was paid on 13.08.2014 and thereby the 2nd respondent has stopped taking further action in the pending proceedings.
3. The statement is placed on record and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
__________________ S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 11th March, 2016
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.23351 of 2009
Date: 11th March, 2016
KL
Chejerla Subbaramaiah
The Deputy Registrar/Officer on Special Duty, PDCC Bank Ltd., Ongole
3 others
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
