Single-judge High Court order disposing of a writ petition challenging illegal proceedings by respondents. The court recorded the respondent's submission that no survey was possible due to disputes and disposed of the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23179 OF 2007
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed declaring the proceedings inssued by the 2nd respondent in D.Dis.No.D/501/2005 dated 30.06.2007 and consequential notice issued by the 3rd respondent in FLR.No.87/07 dated 19.10.2007, as illegal and arbitrary.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that no survey was conducted as on today in view of the disputes raised between the parties.
Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
08-12-2016 dv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition declaring proceedings illegal and arbitrary could be disposed of without conducting a survey due to disputes.
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
