Dismissed
A. Ramulu Goud, v. The Commissioner of Appeals
Telangana HCWP/22758/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No. 22758 OF 2004
ORDER:
When the matter was called on 19.02.2016, there was no representation on either side and, hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption of ‘for dismissal’ to this date. Even today, when the matter again appeared in the list, under the caption of ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default.
In consequence, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Date: 26-02-2016. Dsh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
69
26022016, 29022016
WRIT PETITION No. 22758 OF 2004
Date.26-02-2016
DSH
Petitioner
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court