This short order disposes of multiple writ petitions and appeals by referring to a prior Division Bench judgment, stating the matter is covered thereby with no order as to costs.
All Writ Petitions and Writ Appeals are disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Writ Petition Nos.9568, 9163, 9827,11456, 12590, 13216, 17165, 18422, 19831, 20843, 20865, 20930, 20942, 20948, 20958, 20974, 21127, 21152, 21806, 21974, 22013, 22014, 22043, 22193, 22435, 22691, 22700, 22754, 22919, 22995, 23071, 23793, 23804, 24177, 24251, 24599, 24623, 24785, 24973, 24986, 24995, 25636, 25637, 25648, 25977, 26162, 26304, 26459, 27624, 28143, 28220, 28221, 28358, 29252, 29395 of 2013 & Writ Appeal Nos.1531, 1567, 1568 of 2013
COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue would agree that the subject matter of all these Writ Petitions and Writ Appeals is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary vs. State of A.P. (judgment in W.A.Nos.343 of 2015 and batch dated 29.01.2016). Following the said judgment, and in terms thereof, all these Writ Petitions and Writ Appeals are disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ) _____________________________ (U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J)
01st September 2016 JSU
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Writ Petition Nos.9568, 9163, 9827,11456, 12590, 13216, 17165, 18422, 19831, 20843, 20865, 20930, 20942, 20948, 20958, 20974, 21127, 21152, 21806, 21974, 22013, 22014, 22043, 22193, 22435, 22691, 22700, 22754, 22919, 22995, 23071, 23793, 23804, 24177, 24251, 24599, 24623, 24785, 24973, 24986, 24995, 25636, 25637, 25648, 25977, 26162, 26304, 26459, 27624, 28143, 28220, 28221, 28358, 29252, 29395 of 2013 & Writ Appeal Nos.1531, 1567, 1568 of 2013
Date: 01.09.2016
JSU
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary vs. State of A.P.Referred¶5
Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary vs. State of A.P. (judgment in W.A.Nos.343 of 2015 and batch dated 29.01.2016)
Ramesh Ranganathan
U.Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
