The Acting Chief Justice, reading with Justice Shankar Narayana, dismissed the writ petition by holding its subject matter covered by a Division Bench judgment, following that ruling and disposing of the petition without costs.
The writ petition stood disposed of; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.22668 OF 2005
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Both Sri M.V.J.K. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner,
and Sri S. Suri Babu, learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Tax, would agree that subject matter of this writ petition is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in State of Andhra Pradesh and others v. Bharat Sanchar
Nigam Limited, Hyderabad & others1 .
Following the said judgment and in terms thereof, this
Writ Petition is also disposed of. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending
in the writ petition stand disposed of.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J November 03 , 2016.
PV/Mgr
Petitioner
Respondents
Ramesh Ranganathan
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
