The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel reported no instructions and the service of notice was unsuccessful.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.22253 of 2006
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri V.Bhaskar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has no instructions to appear in the matter and the letter addressed by him to the petitioner was returned unserved.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There
shall be no order as to costs.
____
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
(A.SHANKAR NARAYANA, J)
22 nd December, 2016
JSU
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.22253 of 2006
Date: 22.12.2016
JSU
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
