Common order closing four writ petitions challenging land allotment orders. The court noted that connected petitions had already quashed the impugned allotment orders by the State Government, rendering further orders in the instant petitions unnecessary. Accordingly, the petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
W.P.Nos.21398 & 21433 OF_2009
&
W.P.Nos.29274 & 29436_2014
COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V.Bhatt)
The instant batch of writ petitions was heard and reserved for judgment along with W.P.Nos.14066 & 14067 of 2006.
The prayers in the instant writ petitions are against
the allotment orders in proceedings Nos.SEP/3/104/99 dated 21.02.2003 & SEP/3/19/2001 dated 26.02.2003 of the Chief Commissioner of
Land Administration and confirmed by the Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department in proceedings Nos.35484/J.A.1/2003-19 dated 28.06.2006 & 35484/ J.A.1/2003-24 dated 28.06.2006
We have through separate order in W.P.Nos.14066 & 14067 of 2006 of even date have quashed the allotment orders and allowed W.P.Nos.14066 & 14067 of 2006. Having regard to the fact that allotment orders are set aside at the instance of State Government, no further orders need be passed in the instant writ petitions.
The writ petitions are closed. No costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions in these writ petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE,
ACJ
S.V.BHATT, J Date: 12.02.2016 Lrkm
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
