This is a dismissal order where a writ petition was declared infructuous and dismissed as per the judgment and decree dated 17.09.2003 in O.S.No.3229 of 2001. Any interim order was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 20441 of 2001
Date: 10.06.2016
Between: Mubarak Bin Abdullah Amshan … Petitioner And The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Secretary, Revenue Dept, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 20441 of 2001
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri P.V. Rama Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that in view of judgment and decree, dated 17.09.2003, in O.S.No.3229 of 2001, this writ petition may be disposed of as infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 10.06.2016 ES
Mubarak Bin Abdullah Amshan
The Govt., of A.P.
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
