Petitioners challenged a retirement notice at age 58 years. The court dismissed the petition as the bank had already resolved not to enhance the retirement age to 60 years, rendering no relief feasible in these proceedings.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.19929 of 2014
O R D E R:
Petitioners have filed this Writ Petition assailing the retirement notice issued by the Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Limited informing the petitioners that they would retire from services on completion of the age of 58 years.
shall stand dismissed.
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
20th December, 2016 gra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners relying on retirement notice of 58 years can get relief when bank resolved not to enhance retirement age to 60 years.
Petitioners
Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Limited
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
