Dismissed
Potturi Kranthi Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its
Telangana HCWP/1926/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.1926…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.1926…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.1926 of 2009
ORDER:
Sri G.Naresh Kumar, counsel holding for Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________ S.V.BHATT, J Date:07-04-2016 Prv
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.1926 of 2009
Dated 07-04-2016
Prv
Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana
S.V.BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court