Disposed

Pothula Radha Krishna Murthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC16 Jun 2016WP/19024/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order disposing of a writ petition challenging the non-appointment of a petitioner as a Fair Price Shop Dealer. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application under G.O.Ms.No.4, dated 28.02.2014, within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents-authorities to consider the petitioner's application for appointment as Fair Price Shop Dealer within eight weeks.

Pothula Radha Krishna Murthy Vs The State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶2

WRIT PETITION No. 19024 OF 2016

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for appointment as Fair Price Shop Dealer of P. Nainavaram Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District, on compassionate grounds in terms of G.O.Ms.No.4, dated 28.02.2014.

¶5

The averments made in the affidavit would disclose that the father of the petitioner was appointed as Fair Price Shop Dealer of P. Nainavaram Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District and he died on 24.05.2010. Thereafter, no fair price shop dealer was appointed on permanent basis. While the things stood thus, the petitioner made an application to the respondents requesting to consider his case for appointment as Fair Price Shop Dealer for the aforesaid shop. Further the petitioner submits that para 6 of G.O.Ms.No. 4, Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies (CS.1) Department, dated 28.02.2014 stipulates certain conditions for appointment of legal heirs of deceased Fair Price Shop Dealers. Clause 6(i) & (iii) of the said G.O. entitled the petitioner to be appointed as Fair Price Shop Dealer as the petitioner’s father died on 24.05.2010. Within the parameters prescribed in Clause 6. (i) & (iii) of the said GO, the relief sought for by the petitioner is, to consider and dispose of his application in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 4, dated 28.2.2014.

¶6

The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents does not have any objection for issuance of directions to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.4, dated 28.2.2014.

¶7

In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents-authorities to consider the application of the petitioner for appointment as Fair Price Shop Dealer to the aforesaid fair price shop in terms of G.O.Ms.No.4, dated 28.2.2014 and dispose of the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

¶8

____________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶9

DATED:16.06.2016. Note: Issue CC in three days. B/o. Gk

¶10

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.19024 OF 2016

¶12

Date:16.06.2016

Pothula Radha Krishna Murthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pothula Radha Krishna Murthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Nirmallamma Vs The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution

T. Mallesh, Vs Satavahana University, Karimnagar

Sarode Prasad, Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Sri Sai Srinivasa Agro Tech Industries, Vs The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal

Penugonda Ramu Vs State of Telangana

M/s. G. Nagu Transport Contractors. Vs The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl. Secretary