ignorance due to non-availability of records in the office. D-Form patta issued in favour of the petitioner is produced before this Court evidencing assignment of Acs.1-56 cents of agricultural land in survey No.1477/7 and 6 subject to conditions contained therein. Respondents 1 to 3 admitted assignment of land of an extent of Acs.2-26 cents in survey No.1477/1 and 5 to 7, which is inclusive of land assigned to the petitioner herein. It is not the case of respondents 1 to 3 that they initiated any proceedings under Section 4 of the Act to recover possession, for violation of terms and conditions contained in D-Form patta except contending that the whereabouts of the petitioner were not known to the respondents to initiate any such proceedings, but the same cannot be accepted as civil litigation is pending before Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Machilipatnam, between petitioner, 4th respondent and his father for recovery of possession in respect of the same land. Even otherwise, a specific procedure is provided under Section 4 of the Act for breach of Section 3 of the Act. It is the specific contention of respondents 1 to 3 that the petitioner has violated the provisions of Section 3 (2) of the Act. In the present case, the petitioner himself admitted about cultivation of land by father of 4th respondent on behalf of the petitioner, but not on lease. He also filed a suit in O.S.No.89/2002 on the file of Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Machilipatnam, for recovery of possession alleging that 4th respondent and his father are in unlawful possession. Accepting the contention of the petitioner, the Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, decreed the suit and also ordered the Execution Petition recovered possession of property from
