Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited v. Employees Provident Fund Organisation
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.18510…
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.18510…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.18510 of 2012
ORDER:
Heard Smt.K.Udaya Sri for petitioner. None appears for respondents.
Having regard to the orders subsequently passed by the respondents, counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
The statement is placed on record.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition
shall stand closed.
_____________ S. V. BHATT, J
Dt: 07-06-2016 Prv
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.18510 of 2012
07-06-2016
Prv
Smt. K.Udaya Sri
Respondents
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court