M/ s. Bhuvaneswari Traders, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging police interference with his jaggery business as violative of fundamental rights. The single bench, at the admission stage, directed respondents to stop harassment and interfere only following due process, then disposed of the matter.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent Nos. 3 to 5 not to harass petitioner or interfere with business except following due process of law.