Petitioner challenging discontinuation of old age pension filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking declaration of violation of Articles 14, 21, and natural justice. The court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.17113 of 2016
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in discontinuing to pay the old age pension to the petitioner, though the same is being paid to the other similarly situated old aged persons, is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of doctrine of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to pay the old age pension including arrears.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
__________________________ (T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J)
July 26, 2016. YS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
