Single judge invited counsel for the petitioner who submitted the matter was infructuous. The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous along with pending miscellaneous petitions.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed in consequence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY W.P.No. 16594 OF 2005
ORDER:
Sri K.Venu Madhav, learned counsel for the petitioner, represents that the matter has become infructuous.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs.
_____________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J. Date: 01st April, 2016. JSK
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
