The court held that the writ petition stood disposed of as infructuous due to subsequent developments, without recording the specific development or the court's initial decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No. 16565 OF 2016
18-07-2016
Between: Pendem Lakshmi
… Petitioner
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No. 16565 OF 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development, nothing further survives in the writ petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ A.V. SESHA SAI, J
18-07-2016 ks
Pendem Lakshmi
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Dilip B. Bhosale
A.V. Seshasai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
