The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 13847 of 2004 as infructuous on the submission of the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survived.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous without costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 13847 of 2004
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah)
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive and that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________ G. CHANDRAIAH, J
_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
25th January, 2016
ksm
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 13847 of 2004
25th January, 2016
ksm
G. CHANDRAIAH
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
