Integrated Tribal Development Agency v. Industirial Tribunal-Cum-L.C. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear or provide representation during the hearing on the listed date.
The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear or provide representation during the hearing on the listed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION No. 13495 of 2001
ORDER:
On 18.01.2016 when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall also stand dismissed.
__________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
19th January, 2016 cbs
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Writ Petition No. 13495 of 2001
19th January, 2016
cbs
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court