The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous by Justice Sanjay Kumar without substantive consideration, citing counsel's statement that the cause of action no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
WRI T PETI TI ON No.13174 of 2005
ORDER :
Sri P. Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, states
that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Recording the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
No order as to costs.
____________________ JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR Date:23.09.2016 GJ
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
