This was a one-line order dismissing a writ petition challenging the validity of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act 11 of 2010, relying on a prior Division Bench decision that upheld its validity.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.11299 of 2010
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
The validity of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act 11 of 2010 (for short “Act 11 of 2010”) is under challenge in this writ petition.
As the constitutional validity of Act 11 of 2010 has already been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court in Khader Basha and others vs. Regional Transport Officer, Chittoor1 , we see no reason now to reexamine its validity in the present Writ Petition.
The Writ Petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There
shall be no order as to costs.
____
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
(A.SHANKAR NARAYANA, J)
01st December, 2016 JSU
1 2013(3) ALD 416 (DB)
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.11299 of 2010
Date: 01.12.2016
JSU
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
2013(3) ALD 416 (DB)Referred¶7
Ramesh Ranganathan
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
