Dismissed
J. Ram Reddy, v. The Tahsildar
Telangana HCWP/10625/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous upon the petition counsel submitting the matter was no longer viable.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions to be closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
¶2
WRIT PETITION No.10625 of 2012
¶3
ORDER:
¶4
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has
¶5
become infructuous.
¶6
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
¶7
As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
¶8
__________________ C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, J
¶9
Date:05.01.2016. vhb
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/10625/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court