The High Court disposed of Writ Appeal No.833 of 2007 by noting that the appellants had instructed counsel to withdraw the matter. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, were also disposed of accordingly.
Writ Appeal No.833 of 2007 disposed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No.833 of 2007
23.03.2016
Between: Mir Hasham Ali, Hyderabad, and others. … Appellants And K. Royapa Reddy, Hyderabad, and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No.833 of 2007
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri Sharad Sanghi, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ appeal.
Writ Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
_________________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 23.03.2016 va
Mir Hasham Ali, Hyderabad, and others
K. Royapa Reddy, Hyderabad, and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
